U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Office of International Programs

FHWA Home / Office of International Programs

Chapter 2: General Observations

Throughout the study, the team gathered valuable information not only at formal presentations and discussions, but also during site reviews and travel between venues. Other good sources of information were the informal one-on-one discussions and question-and-answer sessions individual team members had with their hosts. The information derived through these and other methods of communication is included below. These general observations are categorized by subject matter and country.

The study validated the fact that pavement preservation strategies and techniques used throughout the United States enjoy levels of success similar to those used in the host countries. Among them are institutionalizing systematic methods of programming and dedicated funding, using high-quality materials and sophisticated construction equipment, including pavement preservation as an internal element of long-term performance, and recognizing and overcoming potential barriers to success.

ROAD SYSTEM

France

Figure 3. The team visited sites where pavement preservation treatments have been applied.
Figure 3. The team visited sites where pavement preservation treatments have been applied

South Africa

Australia

Table 1. Breakdown of Australian system lengths by state networks.
STATENATIONAL (KM)STATE (KM)LOCAL (KM)
WESTERN AUSTRALIA4,60012,60078,100
VICTORIA18,00022,200127,000
QUEENSLAND4,00034,000133,000
NEW SOUTH WALES19,00020,700142,000

PRIVATIZATION

France

Australia

FUNDING

France

South Africa

Australia

PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES

France

South Africa

Australia

Figure 4. A typical heavy-duty granular pavement section includes a deep subbase
Figure 4 part 1: Surfacing - Size 14/7 Two-Coat Chip SealSurfacing - Size 14/7 Two-Coat Chip Seal
Figure 4, part 2: Base - 200 mm Class 2 Crushed RockBase - 200 mm Class 2 Crushed Rock
Figure 4, part 3: Upper Subbase - 150 to 200 mm Class 3 Crushed Rock Upper Subbase - 150 to 200 mm Class 3 Crushed Rock
Figure 4, part 4: Lower Subbase - 150 mm Granular Material Lower Subbase - 150 mm Granular Material
Figure 4, part 5: Select Filling - 150 to 450 mm (CBR 5 to 10) Select Filling - 150 to 450 mm (CBR 5 to 10)
Figure 4, part 6: Subgrade - Average CBR 2 to 5Subgrade - Average CBR 2 to 5

MATERIALS

France

Table 2. Typical hot-mix pavements in France.
Type Top Size (mm) Thickness (cm) Bitumen TypeModifier
Thin6-14 3-4 Pure Bitumen 
Very Thin6-10230-50/50-70 penSBS, EVA, EMA,
SBR, FIBERS
Ultra Thin6-10 Equals Maximum Size 30-50/50-70 penSBS, EVA, EMA,
SBR, FIBERS
Porous Asphalt 4  
High Modulus  6-8 10-20/15-25 pen 

South Africa

Table 3. Typical hot-mix pavements in South Africa.
Top SizeLift ThicknessNameTop Size
9.5 mm20 mmUltra Thin &,Thin60/70
13.2 mm30 mmThin 
19.0 mm40 mmConventional60/70
26.5 mm60 mmThick Surfaces & Bases 
37.5 mm80 mmAsphalt Bases40/50

Australia

Table 4. Typical aggregate spread rates for single-layer seals
Nominal Size (mm) Average Least Dimension (mm) Application Rate (m2m3)
2010.5-13.760-75
168.6-12.070 -85
146.4-9.780-105
104.1-7.1100-155
5
5 (Matrix)
3.8-4-6
-
135-190
135-250

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

France

South Africa

Australia

MISCELLANEOUS

France

South Africa

Australia

<< Previous Contents Next >>
Page last modified on November 7, 2014
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000