Risk Assessment and Allocation for Highway Construction Management

References

1. Highways Agency (2001). Highways Agency Framework for Business Risk Management. Report of the Highways Agency, London, England, http://www.highways.gov.uk/aboutus/2059.aspx.
2. Reducing Non-Recurring Congestion, Reducing Non-Recurring Congestion, http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/program_areas/reduce-non-cong.htm, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Accessed Aug. 18, 2005.
3. Operations — Did You Know?, http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/didyouknow/didyouknow.asp, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Accessed Aug. 18, 2005.
4. United States Dept. of Labor — Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, Table A-6, Washington, DC, 2003.
5. Improving Traffic Incident Management Together, National Traffic Incident Management Coalition, http://www.timcoalition.org/sites/ntimc/docs/J5224-NTIMC_brochure(2).pdf. Accessed June 12, 2005.
6. Traffic Management Act of 2004, http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/20040018.htm, London, England. Accessed July 5, 2005.
7. Safe working of vehicle breakdown and recovery operators, management system specification, PAS 43: 2002, British Standards Institute, London, England, March 2004.
8. Northrhine-Westfalia Executive Order on Delay Management, Sept. 28, 2005.
9. Richtlijn Eerste Veiligheidsmaatregelen bij Incidenten op auto(snel)wegen, http://www.incidentmanagement.nl/images/eerste%20veiligheidsmaatregel%20IM_tcm22-1905.pdf. Accessed July 5, 2005.
10. Moditech Crash Recovery System®, http://www.moditech.com, Zwaagdijk, the Netherlands. Accessed Aug. 31, 2005.
11. Federal Transit Administration (2004). Risk Assessment Methodologies and Procedures. Unpublished report for the Federal Transit Administration, Project Management Oversight under Contract No. DTFT60-98-D-41013, Washington, DC.
12. Ashley, D., Levitt, R., Logcher, R., and Dziekan, M. (1979). A Quantitative Method for Analyzing the Allocation of Risks in Transportation Construction. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, Research Report No. R78-25, Publication No. 605, prepared for the U.S. Department of Transportation, Report No. UMTA-MA-06-0100-79-1, Washington, DC.
13. Construction Industry Institute (1990). Assessment of Construction Industry Practices and Performances. Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
14. Pennock, M., and Haimes, Y. (2001). "Principles and Guidelines for Project Risk Management." Systems Engineering, 5(2), 89-108.
15. U.S. Department of Energy (2001). Risk Management Survey: Analysis of Responses and Recommendations. Report by R. Railan, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Washington, DC.
16. Wideman, R.M. (1992). Project and Program Risk Management: A Guide to Managing Project Risks. Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA.
17. Smith, R.J. (1995). "Risk Identification and Allocation: Saving Money by Improving Contracting and Contracting Practices." The International Construction Law Review, 40-71.
18. American Society of Civil Engineers (1990). Construction Risks and Liability Sharing, Volume II. American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, DC.
19. American Consulting Engineers Council and Associated General Contractors of America (1992). Owner's Guide to Saving Money by Risk Allocation: Report to the American Consulting Engineers Council and Associated General Contractors of America. Authored by Robert J. Smith, Wickwire Gavin, P.C., American Consulting Engineers Council, Washington, DC.
20. Construction Industry Institute (1993). Allocation of Insurance-Related Risks and Costs on Construction Projects. Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
21. Highways Agency (2001). Delivering Best Value Solutions and Services-Highways Agency Procurement Strategy. Report of the Highways Agency, London, England, http://www.highways.gov.uk/business/procure/best_value/.